What is your take and understanding into this?

Of Krishna is called Kali, then it should have a basis for human understanding.

Ofcourse as we go higher as you’ve also said “form ceases to exist and all that remains is vibrational energy “ !!!

1. On a more scientific/design level, I understand this as the whole of supreme consciousness being divided into two parts (one being static, and the other part moving, which is all of us experiencing the creation).

   At the level of the divine (whole of consciousness), this half and half split is often referred to as fractionation of consciousness which allows the whole to be part static and part dynamic, hence, balanced.

   Now, at the level of individual (parts of the whole consciousness), is it possible for the part to also have a fractionated consciousness — that is a part of my awareness that goes static while the other half remains dynamic?

   So, I understand that the balance yantra can mean :

   – fractionation of awareness is possible at the individual level and is the balance being implied by the symbol

   – separation of witness from the experiencer is balance

   – ⁠both? Neither?

   Please clarify Maa

Could claiming to have no desire or attachment be an excuse or a projection of tamasic vrittis? True detachment arises from wisdom and inner fulfillment, while apathy and disengagement often stem from inertia, fear, or avoidance. How can we recognise whether someone’s detachment is genuine or just a cover for stagnation? And if it is a tamasic vritti, how can one overcome it?

So basically, the containment/attachment is towards this gross biological body and because of this, we are subject to the dance of elemental rules …? This seems to be primary puppeteer of this gross “body and mind” and thus our misery? 

So solution is to work on purifying these senses and thus developing Awareness and Detachment to this gross body and gross mind [thru purification process]? is that the first part of liberation?